Thursday, May 27, 2010

Evolution: Bryan Singer's X-Men 1, 2, and 3 (Part 2)

To paraphrase one of my favorite movies:

“There was a dream that was X-Men 3…”

Sadly, before Director Bryan Singer and his writers Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris could bring it to fruition, they heard the siryn call of
Superman Returns, and it was a call Singer could not refuse. (It was, after all, the movie he’d been waiting his whole life to make.)

I will defend the greatness of
Superman Returns till my dying breath, but along with the warm, happy feelings it leaves me with, I am also left with a small ache for what Singer’s X-Men 3 could have been... the clues to which are littered throughout both previous films.


~*~*~*~

Up till this point, I’ve run on the assumption that anyone reading this blog has already seen at least the first two X-Men movies, but as I’m now about to go into the plot details of those films, I’m gonna throw up a big ol’
SPOILER ALERT
just in case. If you have never seen these movies and feel like you might actually be interested in doing so, read no further. Go rent ‘em, netflix ‘em, buy the DVDs… watch, and enjoy, and then come back here for the rest of my diatribe. Go on! I’m not going anywhere.


~*~*~*~


X-Men ends with a climactic battle in (and on top of) the Statue of Liberty, between the titular heroic mutants and Magneto’s misguided Brotherhood. Magneto intends to set off a radiation-emitting device that will trigger the X-factor (or mutant gene) in regular human beings, thereby making mutants no longer an oppressed minority in the world.

What he doesn’t know is that the false mutation triggered by his machine will eventually
kill all the normal humans who are affected by it.




In the end, the machine is set off, but the X-Men are able to shut it down before the radiation can reach Ellis Island (where a UN summit just so happens to be taking place). Magneto is defeated. The world is safe. The heroes can return home for milk, cookies, and high-fives.

(just as soon as Wolverine heals up)


(silly Logan)


But all is not as it seems. In the Director’s Commentary for
X2, Singer points to something that happens during that final sequence as a clue towards the events in the second movie.

The radiation engulfs the upper half of the statue, covering the X-Men and Magneto. Since they’re all mutants, though, it is believed no harm can come from their exposure to it.

Except…




After the machine has been shut down and everyone is coming down from the Near Miss of it all, we’re shown a brief moment with the team’s telekinetic, Jean Grey. Under the circumstances, it could be easily assumed that this is merely a shot of her reacting to the tension of the scene. A combination of fear and exhaustion, since the last third of the film has seen her using her powers in far more demanding ways than she’s ever done before.


But, what if something else is going on?


Could it be possible that the radiation
has had some kind of effect on her?


X2. When next we find Jean, she and her snazzy new haircut are accompanying a group of students on a field trip to the museum.




While watching over them, she is struck by an overwhelming wave of ambient thought. Everyone in the room
thinking at her all at once. Trying to push these thoughts out of her head, Jean causes all the television screens in the room to flicker, like their signal is being interrupted.




Scott (Cyclops) approaches, concerned. He mentions that "ever since Liberty Island" she's been acting different.

“My telepathy’s been off lately," she tells him. "I can’t seem to focus, I can hear
everything.”

“Jean, it’s not just your telepathy. A month ago you had to concentrate just to levitate a book or a chair across a room. Now, when you have a nightmare, the entire bedroom shakes.”


Wonder what could have caused that.


Skip to halfway through the movie, when a missile is fired at the X-Men’s jet. In a display of power heretofore unseen, Jean disables the missile from the comfort of the cockpit, sending it spiraling off to explode in mid-air.




The effort manifests itself as a flame springing to life in her eyes, and is followed by a moment of confusion and uncertainty on her part. As though she is afraid of wielding so much power.

Later, when forced into confrontation with a mind-controlled Cyclops, Jean’s inner flame once against manifests. She releases a blast of energy that knocks Cyclops back into his right mind and severely damages the facility where the battle takes place…





...leading to the climactic moment of the film.

The X-Men have saved their students from the clutches of the evil Col. William Stryker. They are preparing the jet for take-off, but the controls won’t behave, due to the damage the jet received earlier (from the second missile that Jean couldn’t stop). They’re grounded, and sitting directly in the path of the now-crumbling Alkali Lake dam -- which was damaged by Jean’s earlier showdown with Cyclops (talk about a bed of your own making).

The dam bursts, the water races towards the X-jet. Jean places herself in the path of raging waters, using her new powers to hold back the torrent, while simultaneously repairing the jet and lifting it to safety.






As she finally accepts this new power she’s been given, her entire body erupts into flames, and a sort of serenity overcomes her as she drops her arms and lets the water take her.




The X-Men are safe. Jean Grey is dead.

Or is she?

The final shot of the movie has us moving over the serene waters of Alkali Lake (now a river, I suppose) as Jean’s voice repeats the monologue from the opening of the first movie. And as the music swells, we see a flaming, birdlike figure just beneath the surface of the water.


“...every few hundred millennia, evolution leaps forward.”


So… what do
you think X-Men 3 was supposed to be about?

Obviously, this was all leading up to an adaptation of Chris Claremont and John Byrne’s
Dark Phoenix Saga, arguably the most revered storyline in X-Men history. But how could Singer & Co. translate that space-faring epic to the screen while keeping the somewhat grounded tone of the existing movies? To my mind, it was a simple matter of evolution.

Rather than the voracious cosmic entity which possesses Jean Grey and drives her to consume worlds in the comics… or the disturbed multiple-personality that Xavier locked away in Jean's mind in an attempt to keep her from abusing her enormous gifts in Brett Ratner’s
X-Men 3… the story could have been about evolution. The radiation from Magneto’s machine causes Jean to evolve far beyond any normal mutant, into something with so much devastating potential it puts the whole world at risk.

With this thought in mind, I went searching the web to find out if it had ever been revealed just what Singer’s plans for the third X-Men movie were. Surely, I wasn't the first person to connect these dots, was I?

I wasn't. To my delight, the plans for Singer's third movie had been revealed, and they were even more ambitious than I could have guessed.

I was right about one thing, though… Evolution was the key.

Here’s an excerpt from David Bentley’s blog
The Geek Files (full article HERE):

Author Thomas McClean's book Mutant Cinema: The X-Men Trilogy From Comics to Screen answers some of the questions raised by fans, who have been desperate to find out what Singer and his own writers Dan Harris and Michael Dougherty had been planning for their unmade version of the third film.

Dougherty had already revealed some time ago that they had wanted to cast Sigourney Weaver as Emma Frost, a comic book psychic who would be reimagined as an empath able to control people's emotions. Some reports have suggested that Frost would have been an old flame of Xavier and would have emotionally manipulated a resurrected, unstable Jean Grey into the evil Dark Phoenix.

McLean's book adds new information:
Dougherty says the resolution of the Phoenix plot would definitely have been a major part of their version: "The main element for me was Jean coming back and learning how much power she could wield - that she just became overcome by it."

Dougherty says that many of the ideas he was considering, such as Magneto trying to use Phoenix as a weapon, ended up in the filmed version. He also says that the idea of Jean using Cyclops' power to kill herself was one they liked, though they would have made it clear that only Phoenix's body was dying. Her spirit would live on, evolving Jean past mutant and into a godlike cosmic state.

Dougherty likens it to the closing lines of Arthur C Clarke's novel
2001: A Space Odyssey in which the Star-Child that was astronaut David Bowman hovers over the Earth: "Then he waited, marshalling his thoughts and brooding over his still untested powers. For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next. But he would think of something."


For more detail on the plot and character arcs (I’ll give you a hint: Cyclops doesn’t die in the first act), check out Bentley’s other blog post
HERE.




So there you have it. A far more faithful adaptation of the Phoenix story, and what’s more, a somewhat risky direction to take the third film of a popular franchise. From Chris Claremont to Arthur C. Clarke. From WWII to the cosmos. Singer's X-Men films were always pushing the boundaries of what you'd expect from a comic book superhero movie. Proving that truly ambitious storytelling was not precluded by the presence of a dude with knives in his hands.

Taking this into consideration, I have no doubt he could have pulled off his vision for the third film successfully. To me, Bryan Singer is still the best thing to ever happen to comic book movies.




Here’s hoping he makes another one some day soon.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Evolution: Bryan Singer's X-Men 1, 2, and 3 (Part 1)

As news of the current events in the X-Men universe floods the web, I’ve found myself in a very X-centric (heh) headspace. When not scouring the message boards for vicarious thrills in the reactions and opinions of those experiencing the comics firsthand, I’ve been digging up my old collection of X-books to revisit the bygone glories of yore.


(...what the hell did I just say?)


If I could, I would just break down and buy the latest comics myself, but the
Big Move looms ever closer, and every penny saved is to be treasured.

This past Sunday, my obsession culminated in a miniature X-movie marathon, wherein I watched the first (best) two X-films:
X-Men and X2: X-Men United.


(are you sick and tired of the letter X yet?)


I’ve always enjoyed both movies, though I consider X-Men to be almost an audition tape -- a proof of concept -- for what Singer would achieve in the far superior X2. The first movie is like the first season of an ambitious TV show (season 1 of Buffy the Vampire Slayer comes to mind). It has all the right components, but is still figuring out how to use them to best effect.




X-Men featured a talented cast, a skilled director, an interesting story, and -- something movie studios were only just figuring out at the time -- a healthy respect for the source material that made the movie worth making in the first place. What it lacked, in my eyes, was confidence. The filmmakers knew they had something special on their hands, but also knew they had two masters to serve, each with very different expectations. There was the movie studio, who wanted a tight, entertaining, accessible action flick for the masses, and there was the comic fanbase, who wanted to see their beloved characters brought to the screen faithfully.

Singer and company achieved what seemed impossible at the time, satisfying the demands of both… but the signs of their struggle still showed around the edges. Action scenes were a little too self-conscious to be taken seriously, and edited a little too stiffly to be believable. The quiet, character-building scenes that Singer had shown a mastery of in both previous and subsequent films were edited down to quick, concise exchanges which served only to move the plot forward. The detail and nuance was there, but it was left largely implied. The entire movie is filled with scenes that you enjoy, but wish there was more of. As though something truly special is lurking just on the other side of the cut. 


(In the special features of the X-Men 1.5 DVD, we actually see some of these lost and extended moments, and a part of me wishes we could get an extended edition of the first movie, Lord of the Rings style, just to see these scenes edited into it, regardless of pacing. Sometimes, you just wanna watch the characters talk.)

The movie's plot never quite overcame a small air of stereotypical comic cheesiness, but the weight of the subject matter and characters helped to keep it grounded.

Ultimately, we're given something that satisfies on the basic principals of good storytelling, but does not yet show the chemistry of a truly great film.

That we got with X2.




Here, Singer knew exactly what he was doing, knew exactly where he could go, and went there, and beyond, with the confidence and skill of a master. X-Men was a good movie. X2 was something great. A continuation and expansion of the themes and plotlines of the first film, but with the commitment and assuredness the first film lacked.




Here, there is no rush. The quiet character moments are not only left in, they make the movie. Hell, if not for those moments, one of the most important and relevant characters might have been cut entirely, his storyline lost, and so, the deeper conflict and questions the films sets out to ask, lost as well.

The tone was darker, all pretense of “comicky” flash and dazzle abandoned. This movie was a serious science fiction adventure film. Though not without its moments of levity and humor, it never made fun of itself, never winked at the audience. It took place in a real world which only lent weight and believability to the fantastical exploits of its protagonists.

This is why X2 is a great movie.

But what made it a great X-Men movie is that little something extra. Again, a respect for the source material, not only on the superficial level that movies like Spider-Man, Sin City, or Hellboy managed, but in the deeper spirit of the material. The allegory, the world-view, the interpersonal relationships and small details that only fans of the comics would notice. The stuff that made the comic tick was there on the screen, invisible to all but the few who would appreciate it


X2 was such a great flick…


Then came X-Men 3.


...whoof… did it just get chilly in here…?




Contrary to popular belief, X-Men 3 (or X-Men: The Last Stand) was not a bad movie. It was a solid action flick, at times plenty of fun, that took a lot of those aforementioned superficial elements from the comics and plastered them all over the screen in a story that, based on its own merits, was structurally tight and formulaically satisfying. This does not a bad movie make.

But it was disappointing. Because what had come before had aspired to so much more that, well… audiences didn’t want just a fun action movie. They wanted their serious science fiction saga. They wanted greatness again.

To me, X-Men 3’s largest failing is its near-complete ignorance of the thematic elements that Bryan Singer had built into the series since the very beginning. Not the themes of tolerance or feeling like an outcast -- all of that was covered, though in a way that left many dissatisfied with the message it was sending.

I’m talking about the theme that Singer hands us as the very first words spoken at the very beginning of the first movie…

“Mutation. It is the key to our evolution. It is how we have evolved from a single-celled organism into the dominant species on the planet. This process is slow, normally taking thousands and thousands of years. But every few hundred millennia, evolution leaps forward.”

And that, dear friends, is the story of the X-Men movies. The underlying theme, which Bryan Singer even reiterates to us in the final moments of the second movie, and which Brett Ratner and his team were either unwilling or unable to carry through in the third… Evolution.



~*~*~*~



Be sure to check back for Part 2, wherein I descend to levels of nit-picky geekdom the likes of which no person in their right mind would ever want to subject themselves to...


Wait, that's a horrible teaser.


Be sure to check back for Part 2, wherein I am awesome!


See you soon.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Cheat Week #1

"Yep. Here we are."


Sometimes there's just not enough time in the cosmos. Responsibilities stack up, muses go on vacation, obligations... obligate.

And for those times, we have Cheat Week. These are the weeks in which, rather than spend my usual amount of time constructing brilliantly thought-out blog posts for you to read, I'll instead link to other sites where other people can do all my entertaining for me! Rest assured, barring freak accidents or natural catastrophes, Cheat Weeks will be few and far between. I guarantee you I'll be back next week with more of my own content.

Until then...

WEBCOMIC!!!

Written by one of my very favorite comic writers,
Warren Ellis, and drawn with awe-inspiring clarity and character by Paul Duffield, FREAKANGELS is an experimental webcomic published on the... web... for FREE. Every Friday. By Avatar Press. For free. On the web.

I could do a blurb, but they saved me the trouble...


It's awesome.


Since there's no direct link to the first installment, and its URL seems to be constantly changing, I'll link you to a
Google search for Freakangels Episode 0001. The very first item that comes up should bring you to the first page of the comic, whatever its current URL may be.

Due to the occasional violence and rare nudity, this comic is not always safe for work... well, unless nobody's looking over your shoulder.

Enjoy!

Monday, May 10, 2010

Farewell to a Legend


Frank Frazetta passed away this morning, leaving a hole in the heart of an entire industry.


I wish that I could say I followed his career as closely as it deserved to be followed, but mine was always a peripheral appreciation. His art was a constant in my life, but I never took that time to learn about the man. I often find myself saying this when a beloved creator passes, and it's something I hope to fix in myself one day. I want to know what I've got before it's gone.


Frazetta was an icon, but like so many icons, the weight of his presence was easy to take for granted. Like the shadow of a building or the touch of a loved one, it was easy to think he'd always be there.


I'm glad that he received the recognition for his work that he so richly deserved, both from his peers and fans of the characters he helped to define. His legacy is one of inspiration, which is perhaps the greatest legacy anyone can leave behind. And wherever he is now, I hope he takes with him the pride of a job well done.

Enjoy your well-deserved rest, sir.